Forget Iran,
Americans Should
Be Hysterical About This
By Paul Craig Roberts 2-12-6
Last week the Bureau
of Labor Statistics re-benchmarked the payroll jobs data
back to 2000. Thanks to Charles McMillion of MBG
Information Services, I have the adjusted data from
January 2001 through January 2006. If you are worried
about terrorists, you don't know what worry is.
Job growth over the
last five years is the weakest on record. The US economy
came up more than 7 million jobs short of keeping up with
population growth. That's one good reason for controlling
immigration. An economy that cannot keep up with
population growth should not be boosting population with
heavy rates of legal and illegal immigration.
Over the past five
years the US economy experienced a net job loss in goods
producing activities. The entire job growth was in
service-providing activities--primarily credit
intermediation, health care and social assistance,
waiters, waitresses and bartenders, and state and local
government.
US manufacturing lost
2.9 million jobs, almost 17% of the manufacturing work
force. The wipeout is across the board. Not a single
manufacturing payroll classification created a single new
job.
The declines in some
manufacturing sectors have more in common with a country
undergoing saturation bombing during war than with a
super-economy that is "the envy of the world."
Communications equipment lost 43% of its workforce.
Semiconductors and electronic components lost 37% of its
workforce. The workforce in computers and electronic
products declined 30%. Electrical equipment and appliances
lost 25% of its employees. The workforce in motor vehicles
and parts declined 12%. Furniture and related products
lost 17% of its jobs. Apparel manufacturers lost almost
half of the work force. Employment in textile mills
declined 43%. Paper and paper products lost one-fifth of
its jobs. The work force in plastics and rubber products
declined by 15%. Even manufacturers of beverages and
tobacco products experienced a 7% shrinkage in jobs.
The knowledge jobs
that were supposed to take the place of lost manufacturing
jobs in the globalized "new economy" never appeared. The
information sector lost 17% of its jobs, with the
telecommunications work force declining by 25%. Even
wholesale and retail trade lost jobs. Despite massive new
accounting burdens imposed by Sarbanes-Oxley, accounting
and bookkeeping employment shrank by 4%. Computer systems
design and related lost 9% of its jobs. Today there are
209,000 fewer managerial and supervisory jobs than 5 years
ago.
In five years the US
economy only created 70,000 jobs in architecture and
engineering, many of which are clerical. Little wonder
engineering enrollments are shrinking. There are no jobs
for graduates. The talk about engineering shortages is
absolute ignorance. There are several hundred thousand
American engineers who are unemployed and have been for
years. No student wants a degree that is nothing but a
ticket to a soup line. Many engineers have written to me
that they cannot even get Wal-Mart jobs because their
education makes them over-qualified.
Offshore outsourcing
and offshore production have left the US awash with
unemployment among the highly educated. The low measured
rate of unemployment does not include discouraged workers.
Labor arbitrage has made the unemployment rate less and
less a meaningful indicator. In the past unemployment
resulted mainly from turnover in the labor force and
recession. Recoveries pulled people back into jobs.
Unemployment benefits
were intended to help people over the down time in the
cycle when workers were laid off. Today the unemployment
is permanent as entire occupations and industries are
wiped out by labor arbitrage as corporations replace their
American employees with foreign ones.
Economists who look
beyond political press releases estimate the US
unemployment rate to be between 7% and 8.5%. There are now
hundreds of thousands of Americans who will never recover
their investment in their university education.
Unless the BLS is
falsifying the data or businesses are reporting the
opposite of the facts, the US is experiencing a job
depression. Most economists refuse to acknowledge the
facts, because they endorsed globalization. It was a
win-win situation, they said.
They were wrong.
At a time when America
desperately needs the voices of educated people as a
counterweight to the disinformation that emanates from the
Bush administration and its supporters, economists have
discredited themselves. This is especially true for "free
market economists" who foolishly assumed that
international labor arbitrage was an example of free trade
that was benefitting Americans. Where is the benefit when
employment in US export industries and import-competitive
industries is shrinking? After decades of struggle to
regain credibility, free market economics is on the verge
of another wipeout.
No sane economist can
possibly maintain that a deplorable record of merely
1,054,000 net new private sector jobs over five years is
an indication of a healthy economy. The total number of
private sector jobs created over the five year period is
500,000 jobs less than one year's legal and illegal
immigration! (In a December 2005 Center for Immigration
Studies report based on the Census Bureau's March 2005
Current Population Survey, Steven Camarota writes that
there were 7,9 million new immigrants between January 2000
and March 2005.)
The economics
profession has failed America. It touts a meaningless
number while joblessness soars. Lazy journalists at the
New York Times simply rewrite the Bush administration's
press releases.
On February 10 the
Commerce Department released a record US trade deficit in
goods and services for 2005--$726 billion. The US deficit
in Advanced Technology Products reached a new high.
Offshore production for home markets and jobs outsourcing
has made the US highly dependent on foreign provided goods
and services, while simultaneously reducing the export
capability of the US economy. It is possible that there
might be no exchange rate at which the US can balance its
trade.
Polls indicate that
the Bush administration is succeeding in whipping up fear
and hysteria about Iran. The secretary of defense is
promising Americans decades-long war. Is death in battle
Bush's solution to the job depression? Will Asians finance
a decades-long war for a bankrupt country?
Paul Craig Roberts was
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street
Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National
Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good
Intentions.He can be reached at: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. DaScribbler has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is DaScribbler endorsed or sponsored by the
originator.)